<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mouli Cohen&#187; G-20 Tackles the Question of Bonuses | Mouli Cohen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moulicohen.com/tag/great-britain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moulicohen.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Entreprenurial Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>G-20 Tackles the Question of Bonuses</title>
		<link>http://www.moulicohen.com/2009/09/15/g-20-tackles-the-question-of-bonuses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.moulicohen.com/2009/09/15/g-20-tackles-the-question-of-bonuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>natelithgow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G-20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moulicohen.com/?p=1079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been following the run-up to next week&#8217;s G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh rather closely, and am concerned about the nature of the debate thus far. Before the self-congratulating and back-patting begins on the G-20&#8217;s &#8220;could have been worse&#8221; attitude over the current state of the recession &#8211; and the prospective recovery &#8211; begins, the big [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following the run-up to next week&#8217;s G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh rather closely, and am concerned about the nature of the debate thus far. Before the self-congratulating and back-patting begins on the G-20&#8217;s &#8220;could have been worse&#8221; attitude over the current state of the recession &#8211; and the prospective recovery &#8211; begins, the big issue among the world&#8217;s economic leaders seems to be on the issue of bonuses.</p>
<p>Here in the U.S., we&#8217;ve certainly witnessed our fair share of anger over the bonus structure currently in place in the finance industry. After last year&#8217;s hasty first round of bailouts, and the subsequent fallout over much of that money being used for bonuses, golden parachutes, and other forms of superfluous cash-buttressing, Americans were clearly ready for some decisive reform. Europe, similarly, has called for a change in &#8220;bonus culture&#8221; since the collapse began in earnest around this time last year.</p>
<p>Still keen on keeping some sense of laissez-faire, the United States and Great Britain have been tepid on the idea of hard and fast bonus regulation, whereas Germany and France have &#8220;demanded a tough line,&#8221; according to an article in <a href="http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14419192&amp;source=hptextfeature" target="_blank">The Economist</a>. The tough thing about this issue is that bonuses can be taxed at higher rates than the baseline salaries of high-earning bankers.</p>
<p>In response to any global policies curtailing bonus culture, the big banks of the world will likely raise salaries to ensure the best talent doesn&#8217;t simply set up shop in a country capable of providing bigger bonuses. In any case, the challenge will be to keep tax revenue flowing in from the bigger earners, whether that means a change in the tax code, or simply more aggressively taxing whatever bonuses do get passed out. Needless to say, it will likely be a while before anti-bank sentiment dies down worldwide.</p>
<p>[image via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gregscargill/3491689347/" target="_blank">Gregory Warran</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.moulicohen.com/2009/09/15/g-20-tackles-the-question-of-bonuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

